Originally Posted on my old website in 2008, some of the LINKS may no longer be available....
PROOF that Global Warming is a “Natural Occurrence” and is the BIGGEST SCAM ever perpetrated on the American people and the world. All for money via “Carbon Credits” and soon “Carbon Foot-Print Taxes” on YOU!
PROOF that Global Warming is a “Natural Occurrence” and is the BIGGEST SCAM ever perpetrated on the American people and the world. All for money via “Carbon Credits” and soon “Carbon Foot-Print Taxes” on YOU!
The Carbon-Credit Factor
by: Victor
Lloyd Burgess San Jose, CA. April 2008
Make-up your
own mind before it’s too late to stop the
“Carbon Credit Taxes” that will
be here soon! Like
I said, follow the money! Go see who is profiting from Carbon Credits… my guess
is that soon we will all be weighed annually and it reported to the government.
Who then determines our “Carbon-Footprint Factor” which is then used to TAX us
on everything we do, buy or own. Like our homes, cars, plane tickets, medical
plans and resources used, land, foods, water electric and gas bills and soon
the very air we breath.... etc, etc, etc .....the “Carbon-Credit Factor”.
I superimposed other relevant data over the chart below… you tell me if Global Warming can be man-caused.
In the chart below you can
see that there have been 6 global warming cycles marked in GREY - of which the first 5 was before “Man” or “Modern Man”
was even on the planet! As a matter of fact, there were less than 125,000 “cavemen” on the planet, and
they were living in the STONE - AGE!
All they had was fire. I didn’t look up any information on when the
Flintstones were here.
Basically the
chart shows the temperature at the Antarctic on the top two BLUE and GREEN lines… with a “dotted”
line marking ZERO degrees
Celsius or 32 degrees Fahrenheit
- or FREEZING.
The bottom line
in RED shows the “Ice Pac” which shows when it was
above the dotted line or above freezing and would result in melting or “Global Warming”. Anytime you see the RED line “above” the dotted line, you have melting… “below” the dotted line it is freezing and growing the ice-pack.
Remember the
chart reads from RIGHT to LEFT, the RIGHT side being 450,000 years ago.
Image
from Global Warming Art - This image is an original work created for Global
Warming Art. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this image
under either: The GNU Free Documentation License Version 1.2; with no Invariant
Sections, Front-Cover Texts, or Back-Cover Texts. The Creative Commons
Attribution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike License Version 2.5
Please
refer to the image description page on Global Warming Art for more information
I really don’t
care what or how you want to present ANY
THEORY or RATIONAL to
argue that man is the cause or has any influence on the “Global Warming” scam… it CAN’T be believed, if it can’t explain
how the “Global Warming”
happened BEFORE WE WERE HERE!
Now what
bothers me is if you look at the temperature cycles from the RIGHT to the LEFT, you can see more “erratic”
or “volatile” temperature
readings increasing erratic behavior on each cycle… I think we need to look at
the earth’s orbit around the sun and our solar systems movement through the
universe for that answer… All I can say is that we can spend ALL the Earth’s Nation’s wealth to try
and reduce our impact on the issue, which will only make certain OTHER people wealthy on all those “Carbon Credits”. But, we won’t have
any effect on the “Natural Warming”
cycle.
By the way, do YOU know who stands to profit
the most on this SCAM? Like I said, follow the money! Go see who is profiting
from Carbon Credits…
IF, this chart IS accurate and NOT under
dispute, then “Global Warming” IS a natural and recurring planetary reality.
Also, that means that this planet has spent only about 80,000 years or about 18%
of this time “Warmed up” and about 370,000 years or about 82% of that last
450,000 years FROZEN!
If you look at the Table below you can see that between the years 2000 and 3200 BC or 5,200 years
ago is when man-kind went from the “Neolithic”
stone-age, through the “Bronze-Age”
and the “Iron-Age” and Modern-days of today, and will ALL fit in the last half of the LAST GREY cycle!
So how did WE have ANYTHING to do with the previous 4 or 5 cycles?
What we need
to worry about is that we are nearing the End of THIS warming
cycle...
Population
|
Years Ago
|
Year
|
Age of Humankind
|
Age
|
6 Billion
|
2,000
|
2000 AD
|
2000 - 1900
AD
|
Modern Civilization
|
50 Million
|
3,300
|
1300 BC
|
539 - 1300 BC
|
the Iron Age
|
5,200
|
3200
|
BC1087 - 3200
BC
|
the Bronze
Age
|
|
8,000
|
6000 BC
|
3000 - 6000
BC
|
the New Stone Age - Neolithic
|
|
4
Million
|
12,000
|
10,000 BC
|
6000 - 10,000 BC
|
the
Middle Stone Age - Mesolithic
|
50,000
|
48,000 BC
|
10,000 - 2.5 mil BC
|
the
Old Stone Age - Paleolithic
|
|
>125,000
|
100,000
|
98,000 BC
|
100,000 BC - 2000 AD
|
the
First Modern Humans
|
2 million
|
1.998 mil BC
|
48,000 - 2 mil BC
|
the
First Humans
|
Table Data Source: http://www.usd.edu/~clehmann/courses/wcchron.htm
The first solid evidence of human use of fire in Eurasia as early as
790,000 years ago has been found in excavations in Israel conducted by the
Hebrew University of Jerusalem Institute of Archaeology.
NOTE
(for the Ice Temperature Changes chart above): This figure shows the Antarctic
temperature changes during the last several glacial/interglacial cycles of the
present ice age and a comparison to changes in global ice volume. The present
day is on the left.
The
first two curves shows local changes in temperature at two sites in Antarctica
as derived from deuterium isotopic measurements (δD) on ice cores (EPICA
Community Members 2004, Petit et al. 1999). The final plot shows a
reconstruction of global ice volume based on δ18O measurements on
benthic foraminifera from a composite of globally distributed sediment cores
and is scaled to match the scale of fluctuations in Antarctic temperature
(Lisiecki and Raymo 2005). Note that changes in global ice volume and changes
in Antarctic temperature are highly correlated, so one is a good estimate of
the other, but differences in the sediment record do no necessarily reflect
differences in paleotemperature. Horizontal lines indicate modern temperatures
and ice volume. Differences in the alignment of various features reflect dating
uncertainty and do not indicate different timing at different sites.
The
Antarctic temperature records indicate that the present interglacial is
relatively cool compared to previous interglacials, at least at these sites.
The Liesecki & Raymo (2005) sediment reconstruction does not indicate
significant differences between modern ice volume and previous interglacials,
though some other studies do report slightly lower ice volumes / higher sea
levels during the 120 ka and 400 ka interglacials (Karner et al. 2001, Hearty
and Kaufman 2000).
No comments:
New comments are not allowed.